?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Sky Nash [userpic]
by Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
at April 2nd, 2009 (05:57 pm)

Some from the other day I forgot about













if you want to add me feel free :)

Comments

Posted by: Moi (amante_donne)
Posted at: April 2nd, 2009 06:14 pm (UTC)

really good photographs, did you take them yourself?

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 02:02 pm (UTC)

yeahhh with my remote :D

Posted by: Moi (amante_donne)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 02:04 pm (UTC)

wow, they are fantastic, the contrast and lighting on them is superb, did you do any post picture editing? it helps of course that you are a very attractive subject for your camera.

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 07:25 pm (UTC)

i used auto colour and contrast on those, and added the border and the text, but nothing more,

:P i believe that you dont need photoshop to take a nice photo, and if you need it, its not worth it

Posted by: Moi (amante_donne)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 09:49 pm (UTC)

Photoshop does have its uses but it wont make a badly composed image a good one. I liked the colour of yours almost like a filter had been on the screen, the wallpaper is superb and a great contrast against the black of your clothes and hair, superb stuff.

I found this site some time ago http://www.timecatcher.com/ i contacted one of the guys asking if they used photoshop and he said he didnt (don't know about the other contributors), just his cameras and filters.

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 4th, 2009 07:49 am (UTC)

Its the different settings on my camera that ive found makes the unusual tones, mostly the tungsten one i think?

i looked at that site quickly, some of them are georgous, it helps when you have expensive and good equipment too.

Posted by: Moi (amante_donne)
Posted at: April 4th, 2009 10:03 am (UTC)

yeah it must be that tungsten mode, it gives it a unique look. What camera to you have, mine doesnt have that filter

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 5th, 2009 11:20 am (UTC)

Yeahh, i use a canon 450 :)

Posted by: Moi (amante_donne)
Posted at: April 6th, 2009 10:04 am (UTC)

I just looked in my manual (i have a Canon EOS D10) and it does have the tungsten, well well i never lol.

Posted by: John Tkalcich (jmtkalcich)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 03:09 am (UTC)

nice as always.

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 02:02 pm (UTC)

:)

Posted by: globjaw (globjaw)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 05:57 pm (UTC)

you got a great face... you even look kinda dangerous... awesome.

Posted by: Kyle (luger_)
Posted at: April 3rd, 2009 07:12 pm (UTC)

I concur. Its the kind of look that says that if you're looking, you may be liable for an ass kicking!

But good none the less :-)

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 4th, 2009 07:49 am (UTC)

hahahah :P i wouldnt do that

Posted by: Kyle (luger_)
Posted at: April 4th, 2009 05:15 pm (UTC)

Lol. Its definitely the first and fourth pictures I get he impression. Kind of a "And what the hell do you think YOU'RE looking at?".

In a good way though

:D

Posted by: Sky Nash (miss_sky1)
Posted at: April 5th, 2009 11:19 am (UTC)

Ahhhh thats mad :P

Posted by: hiemaleclipse (marieceleste)
Posted at: April 15th, 2009 04:50 pm (UTC)

Very sensitive treatment, and love the blues and soft focus, it makes the satin look really touchy feelie.

17 Read Comments